Website Content

  Homes arrow Website Content arrow Page 7 - How Important Is Wikipedia In The Grand Schem...
 Webmaster Tools
 
Base64 Encoding 
Browser Settings 
CSS Coder 
CSS Navigation Menu 
Datetime Converter 
DHTML Tooltip 
Dig Utility 
DNS Utility 
Dropdown Menu 
Fetch Content 
Fetch Header 
Floating Layer 
htaccess Generator 
HTML to PHP 
HTML Encoder 
HTML Entities 
IP Convert 
Meta Tags 
Password Encryption
 
Password Strength
 
Pattern Extractor 
Ping Utility 
Pop-Up Window 
Regex Extractor 
Regex Match 
Scrollbar Color 
Source Viewer 
Syntax Highlighting 
URL Encoding 
Web Safe Colors 
Forums Sitemap 
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us 
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
WEBSITE CONTENT

How Important Is Wikipedia In The Grand Scheme Of Things?
By: Bill Platt
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating:  stars stars stars stars stars / 0
    2007-08-31

    Table of Contents:
  • How Important Is Wikipedia In The Grand Scheme Of Things?
  • The fact that...
  • The convenience of...
  • Lazy Research...
  • Academia is generally...
  • For those involved...
  • The Good Faith...
  • Final Thoughts...

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     

    SEARCH DEV MECHANIC

    TOOLS YOU CAN USE

    advertisement

    How Important Is Wikipedia In The Grand Scheme Of Things? - The Good Faith...


    (Page 7 of 8 )

    The Good Faith Argument

    Much to my own surprise, the fellow who originally suggested that the Matt Cutts page should have been deleted got into the fray that resulted from his action. He even made reference to having read Sullivan's comments and chose to use them as a springboard to belittle Sullivan:

    "The sources provided by Sullivan in his blog are interesting and some would even make great additions to a number of AfD-submitted articles to help fulfill notability (it's a shame he spent the time to make personal commentary about me on his blog than to improve these poorly drafted articles, but to each his own)."

    For a guy who quotes the Wikipedia guidelines about "assuming good faith" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:AGF) as frequently as he does, I think his own comments about Sullivan betray his double standards about "good faith".

    It is true that one would not expect anyone who studied Bioinformatics (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioinformatics) in college to understand who the players are in the search industry, but then one would also not expect a person who knew nothing about an industry to judge who is notable in that industry either. It would be like me assuming to be able to identify notable people in the bioinformatics field... Yep, that would be dishonest and silly.

    More Website Content Articles
    More By Jase Dow

       

    WEBSITE CONTENT ARTICLES

    - Words of Wisdom from SEO Chat Forums
    - Three Ways to Approach Content Differently
    - Thinking Beyond the Sale
    - Don`t Use Article Spinning Software
    - Give Customers the Gift of Convenience
    - Target Your Content for SEO
    - You Need Likes as Well as Links
    - Double Check These Before Going Live
    - Liven Up Your Blog with Video Content
    - Get Your Spelling and Punctuation Right
    - Improve Your Site`s Grammar
    - Content Marketing Checklist
    - Keep Traffic on Your Web Pages
    - Use a List to Increase Traffic
    - Write With a Purpose

    Developer Shed Affiliates

     



    © 2003-2018 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster - Follow our Sitemap