Blog Help

  Homes arrow Blog Help arrow Page 4 - Bloggers and the Associated Press: the Past a...
 Webmaster Tools
Base64 Encoding 
Browser Settings 
CSS Coder 
CSS Navigation Menu 
Datetime Converter 
DHTML Tooltip 
Dig Utility 
DNS Utility 
Dropdown Menu 
Fetch Content 
Fetch Header 
Floating Layer 
htaccess Generator 
HTML Encoder 
HTML Entities 
IP Convert 
Meta Tags 
Password Encryption
Password Strength
Pattern Extractor 
Ping Utility 
Pop-Up Window 
Regex Extractor 
Regex Match 
Scrollbar Color 
Source Viewer 
Syntax Highlighting 
URL Encoding 
Web Safe Colors 
Forums Sitemap 
Weekly Newsletter
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us 
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 

Bloggers and the Associated Press: the Past and the Future
By: Katie Gatto
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars / 1

    Table of Contents:
  • Bloggers and the Associated Press: the Past and the Future
  • Stage Two: Simmering Contempt
  • Stage Three: An Angry Stalemate
  • Bring in the Lawyers

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article




    Bloggers and the Associated Press: the Past and the Future - Bring in the Lawyers

    (Page 4 of 4 )

    In 2008 the Associated Press sent six Digital Millennium Copyright Act Takedown Notices to The Drudge Retort. The pieces in question borrowed between 35 and 65 words of Associated Press materials, mainly quotes and titles. Each one was cited properly back to the Associated Press's website with a link. None of them was substantially made up of these quotes. Most were editorial content written about the stories in question. Given all of this information, it does not take a lawyer to see that this is clearly fair use.

    As a matter of fact, it didn't. This request set off a firestorm in blogs far and wide about the takedown requests. Soon enough, the Associated Press was taking back the threats of lawsuits, and "revising its guidelines."

    The Ironic Part Here

    It is worth noting that these notices are ironic because the Associated Press takes whole pieces from the RSS feeds of bloggers to offer to their members for publication. Don't bother going back, you need that correctly. They sued a blog over using 35 properly cited words -- while they take whole pieces off of blogs for their members' use without compensating them.

    Apparently, their position is that the protection of copyright only extends to their own members. Later in that some year, they tried to instate a pay-to-quote system that started with as few as five words, at a rate of $12.50.These two actions caused many bloggers to boycott linking to, or using, materials from the Associated Press at all.

    Where Do We Go From Here?

    That's a good question. Here are a few ways it could play out.

    Legal Firefights

    As prominent bloggers and blog networks gain revenue, they begin to counter sue the Associated Press for using their articles. The Associated Press responds, and the face of copyright law is radically altered. Depending on who has better lawyers, the result could make the field much more open, or fair use could die out.


    Newspapers, on the verge of extinction as a medium, finally decide that they need to work with bloggers in order to stay alive. Linking and cross-quoting become a generally accepted practice. Online news sites that act like SEO black holes are looked down upon until policies change. Yes, this means that proper linking and citations will be a must, but a set of online citation standards is established.

    Bloggers Unite

    Riled by the Associated Press and its legal attacks, the bloggers of the world band together to create one unified syndicated service. This allows only blogs to share content. The speed of this sharing, and exclusion of Associated Press member blogs, makes bloggers more timely, and by volume alone, outpaces traditional media. These outlets begin to die off.

    Of course, one or all of things could happen. It is not inconceivable that a volley of lawsuits in both directions could alter copyright law, forcing bloggers to unite. The then-dying print papers could find themselves forced to collaborate with the bloggers. However it plays out, it seems unlikely that we'll ever go back to reading the news in quite the same way.

    DISCLAIMER: The content provided in this article is not warranted or guaranteed by Developer Shed, Inc. The content provided is intended for entertainment and/or educational purposes in order to introduce to the reader key ideas, concepts, and/or product reviews. As such it is incumbent upon the reader to employ real-world tactics for security and implementation of best practices. We are not liable for any negative consequences that may result from implementing any information covered in our articles or tutorials. If this is a hardware review, it is not recommended to open and/or modify your hardware.


    - Blogging to Attract Holiday Shoppers
    - Commit to Your Blog, or Don`t Blog
    - Should You Blog on Google Plus?
    - Fast Blog Post Ideas
    - Organize Your Business Blogging
    - Too Busy to Blog?
    - The Value of a Business Blog
    - WordPress CMS Tips: Removing RSS Feeds
    - Add Google Custom Search to WordPress Blogs
    - Start Blogging with Blogger
    - Bloggers and the Associated Press: the Past ...
    - WordPress Vs. Blogger: Which Should You Choo...
    - Can You Make Money with a Free Blog?
    - A Beginner`s Guide to Self Hosting Your Blog
    - No Blog Stands Alone: Why You Need Affiliates

    Developer Shed Affiliates


    © 2003-2018 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster - Follow our Sitemap